Wednesday, May 31, 2006

"24-hour revise"

That's what the Advisor is calling it--to distinguish from an actual good revision that will lead to an actual good proposal. This one is just to get something into the hands of the committee, members of which have been warned that the proposal is "drafty." Nice adjective. Almost as good as "bored with itself."

I reported in an earlier post that the weak part of my proposal is the "Objective" and still weak but better is the "State of the Question." The stronger part is the "Procedure." Exactly wrong. Reverse those. That is the reality.

Mad "24-hour revise" commences. I will report back tomorrow. Unless I'm drunk. Then I will report Friday. Or I could report drunk. That might be fun.

No comments: